Article by Sam Winebaum and Jeff Beck
Adidas Ultraboost 5X ($180)
Introduction
The Ultraboost 5X is a brand new take on the UB focused first and foremost on running performance. Well known for its iconic styling, Boost midsoles, knit uppers, plastic midfoot cages and underfoot plastics this new UB loses the cage and simplifies the midfoot plastic support to a tried and true X shaped Torsion system. Adi “boosts” the Light Boost 9mm front and back and still loses about 0.5 oz / 14g in weight to come in about 9.85 oz / in a US9.
That is light for its big 39 mm heel / 29mm forefoot stack height and full combination Continental and crystal type rubber outsole. It is about 1 oz / 30g lighter than what I see as its closest competitor the slightly lower stack height Saucony Triumph 22 while sitting on the same width 95 mm heel / 75 mm midfoot / 115 mm forefoot platform.
The result is yet another 2024 hit from adidas in its long neglected everyday running category. It joins the lighter and livelier Adizero SL 2 (RTR Review) and slightly lower stack height and somewhat more stability focused Supernova Prima (RTR Review).
By freeing Boost Light foam from its prior cages, adding more of it while losing weight, adidas has “boosted” the energy level of the ride at any pace while increasing cushion and comfort. Please read on for my impressions after a first faster 6 mile run today.
Pros:
- Highly energetic pleasing ride- Boost Light foam shines! - Sam, Jeff
- Consistent feel and cushion at all paces - Sam, Jeff
- Versatile; pretty much any pace or distance run except short tempo or intervals.
- Well held for a stretch knit upper
- Tenacious and noticeable Continental traction even on dry roads. Expect great durablity. - Sam, Jeff
Cons:
- Time to rethink the knit upper: stretch knit upper adds weight, requires thick overlays and underlays and a plastic clip, doesn’t quite keep up with the far higher performance platform underfoot. - Sam, Jeff
- Higher end pricing for a trainer- Sam, Jeff
- Loose knit doesn’t make for a secure hold - Jeff
Most comparable shoes
Saucony Triumph 22 (RTR Review)
361 Eleos (RTR Review)
Supernova Prima (RTR Review)
Nike Pegasus 41 (RTR Review)
Ultraboost Light (RTR Review)
Stats
Approx. Weight: men's 9.85 oz / 279g
Prior Version Weight: men’s oz / g
Sample Weight: men’s 9.62 oz / 273g US , 10.26 oz / 291g US10.5
Stack Height: men’s 39 mm heel / 29 mm forefoot ( 10mm drop)
Platform Width: 95 mm heel / 75 mm midfoot / 115 mm forefoot
First Impressions, Fit and Upper
Sam: Classic Ultraboost styling, modernized and streamlined. Gone are the bulbous lines, plastic cages, and showy underfoot plastics of the 2023 Ultraboost Light (RTR Review). A stunning clean and striking design.
Without visually appearing to be so, up goes the stack height of Light Boost by 9mm and down goes the weight by about 0.5 oz / 14g.
The upper is the customary stretch Primeknit. I believe seen on Ultraboost since day one.
It is a most comfortable upper as in lieu of the infamous cage the midfoot is held on both sides by thick “3 Stripes” overlays which, by the way, are highly reflective. And that is not all as inside we have laminated underlays at midfoot. All to keep the stretch in check when actually running..and that is what 5X is focused first and foremost on.
The tongue is a decently thick unpadded stretch knit. For a knit upper midfoot hold is adequate for my medium to low volume feet with the lace up easy and secure. .
The heel and collars are well padded with not only pillow type pads but a molded padded achilles and far rear of the shoe which is quite pliable. To support the foot at the rear, a plastic clip surrounds the heel area rising on both sides. Comfortable with good hold.
The toe box is not super broad, or high, but the knit stretches, more vertically in the center than at the sides and toe bumper where the knit is denser for support. The toe bumper is pliable.
As often customary with Ultraboost, the silhouette is “long” I have a full thumb and a bit of front space which. given the low very front of the shoe, is correct and presents no problems. I was true to size for my low to medium volume feet. Very narrow low volume feet might consider sizing down half a size.
While a fine Primeknit upper. and the best yet for an Ultraboost for me, I think it is time to reimagine the upper and materials as it does not quite keep up with the new much higher actual run performance profile of the overall platform underfoot.
Jeff: I agree with Sam on a number of items. Bulbous is absolutely the best way to describe the previous version, and even though it was called the Ultraboost Light, it wasn’t all that light, especially considering how thin the forefoot felt. First impressions are a substantial performance improvement, and while they stuck with the Ultraboost’s longtime formula of comfort, as a running shoe there aren’t caveats like we’ve had in the past. There’s no need to try to qualify it, this is an actual honest-to-goodness running shoe.
I’m with him that the upper is made from a comfortable knit, but I’ve found it has stretched quite a bit. I’ve only put about 30 miles on them, and I already can’t get a dialed in fit leading to several minor ankle rolls. It’s not an inherently unstable shoe, but the upper feels much more casual focused. If they’d have gone with the midfoot cage I’m not sure if it would perform better. That stretchy upper does make the adequate width toebox effectively even wider, but it doesn’t hold the foot that well (which is why I’m not confident a built up midfoot cage would help).
The only part I’d disagree with Sam is the sizing of this model. In the past the length did seem off, but this time around the length seems accurate - my standard size 10.5 gives about a thumb’s width from my largest toe. That said, he’s spot on about narrow footed runners likely needing to size down.
Midsole & Platform
Sam: Unlike recent Ultraboosts, the star of the show here is not the styling or added underfoot plastics but the Light Boost midsole foam and lots more of it, 9mm more front and back to come in at a max heel of 39mm and forefoot of 29 mm. The prior Ultraboost with Light Boost felt “thin” and firm upfront not only due to less foam height but due to its more extensive plastics above the outsole as shown below.
To put it politely, it was a quite rough front ride.
Not so here! To stabilize the midfoot for those that land there and move the transitions along, and they are easy and smooth at any pace, adidas goes with an X shaped yellow Torsion System.
Torsion is proven and I find effective. We also get a flex point at the ends of the X and a lively somewhat bouncy toe off which is stabilized by the full front rubber coverage.
Heel landings are smooth with lots of energetic rebound with the transition well decoupled even though there is no deep decoupling groove. Quite different from the Supernova Rise where the similar design heel felt firmer, stiffer and harder to roll off of.
This midsole is big smiles for me. The Light Boost foam is more pulled together and is less bouncy soft as old Boost was, requiring EVA layers to keep it under control and stable. Here the feeling is of lots of “energy” returned but never in a wild manner yet which is also nonetheless super fun in feel.
Adidas did a great job balancing a ‘pure” all foam experience with enough stability from the broad platform, X Torsion System and especially the outsole which provides plenty of response.
Compared to adidas new Dreamstirke+ supercritical foam in the Prima and Rise, the Light Boost feels a touch softer and bouncier. a bit slower to return, maybe less dense but yet more pleasing. Light Boost feels closest to Saucony’s PWRRUN Pb in the new Triumph 22 but with a more effective overall “drive train” given Torsion and outsole design and is less ponderous and lighter.
Outsole
The outsole consists of a rear landing pad of always great Continental rubber, a central asymetrical area of a “crystal” type rubber and a big medial area of again Continental. This outsole not only provides traction and protection but is clearly also designed to support key areas of the stride.
The lateral heel Continental is more extensive for heel landing stability than the medial with the Continental more extensive on medial forefoot to provide a solid stable and super well gripping toe off platform.
I say super well gripping toe off platform as this was clearly noticed. The outsole has tenacious grip with plentiful profiling accentuating the grip, but not getting in the way. The grip was among the best if not the best for my light sand over pavement test, always a challenge.
Ride, Conclusions and Recommendations
This is an initial review after a very solid 6 mile run with a wide variety of paces on a moderately hilly course. I will update as I run them more, if need be that is! That said, the picture is very clear here.
Adidas has delivered a high stack daily trainer with lots of fun and consistent cushioning and very lively energy return, and no matter the pace. Update: my 2nd 6 mile run was a far slower paces than the first and here too the ride was smooth and easy to turn over. That said for uptempo longer runs, I would go with their Supernova Prima or Boston 12 and for short fast runs their Adizero SL2.
Where does the Ultraboost 5X sit then? Max cushion all around daily training if you want a softer neutral ride with plenty of return and big smiles .
It is in a crowded category of plated and unplated trainers with big stacks of lively modern cushioning. It cleverly sits in a middle ground between the non totally rigid, non carbon plated trainers (Endorphin Speed, Boston 12, Hyperion Max 2, Neo Vista) and the unplated big shoes (Triumph 22, GEL Nimbus, Vomero 17, 361 Pegasus 41 361 Eleos) as it does have the more minimal X shaped plastic midfoot Torsion System and that extensive outsole.
The Torsion and outsole give it enough mid foot support to keep things stable enough as a neutral shoe and quick to toe off without making the shoe overly plate stiff and snappy reacting which can preclude slower paces or overly soft and ponderous as unplated shoes with big stack and no plate can be. For a similar riding big shoe from adidas with more upper support and underfoot stability look at the Supernova Prima.
It loses weight and is lighter than competitors such as the Triumph, Nimbus, Pegasus and Vomero and that weight difference is clearly felt. Even though a tremendous amount has changed here, tradition is knit uppers for the Ultraboost. aWhile I think this is the best UB stretch knit upper adidas should reimagine Primeknit in future Ultraboost X to yet better secure the foot and drop more weight.
Adidas is clearly on a roll! After several years focused on the elite leaning Adizero lines and records with the EVO 1 stunning with its incredibly lightweight and results, attention has shifted this year towards the “everyday” runner and a total modernization of the Supernova and Boost lines.
Not content to have the Utraboost continue as essentially a “lifestyle” shoe which it has been for several years with the Ultraboost 5X they bring back and even amplify what made early Boost shoes great and innovative, bounce and return to the ride. With the original Energy Boost and Adios Boost, way back, smiles came to training and racing and here while Boost Light t is one of many modern riding foams (including several at adidas) that magic returns to the adidas line up in a new flavor.
Jeff: Sam nailed it, adidas really has a phenomenal daily trainer to go along with their outstanding racing lineup. The upper fit could be tightened up, but otherwise it’s a phenomenal shoe that has a truly fun riding midsole. It isn’t super soft or bouncy, but soft and bouncy enough to make for an entertaining shoe that doesn’t have the hint of gimmick.
The cost is a little high, but part of that is the 361 Eleos broke the curve for dollar-to-performance ratio - though it is $10 less than the previous version, so there’s something to be said for that. Ultimately, if you’re looking for a high performing max cushioned trainer, you could do much worse.
Jeff’s score 8/10
Ride (50%): 10 Fit (30%): 7 Value (15%): 8 Style (5%): 10
😊😊😊😊😊
6 Comparisons
Index to all RTR reviews: HERE
Adidas Ultraboost Light (RTR Review)
Jeff: The UB Light had to walk so the 5X could run. Both sport the same midsole material, but the UBL was heavier and less cushioned with a pronounced plastic support running through it.
The 5X has noticeably more cushioning, especially in the forefoot, and the plastic midsole support system is much more subtle.
All that and $10 less, the 5X is one of the best single model improvements in recent shoe history.
Saucony Triumph 22 (RTR Review)
Jeff: One of the top max cushion shoes on the market, Saucony switched it up with the 22 going from PWWRUN+ midsole to PWRRUN Pb, making a soft and bouncy shoe even softer and bouncier. Very similar performance to the UB 5X, the Triumph is softer and has a better fitting upper, the UB is just a touch firmer with a little more bounce to it.
361 Eleos (RTR Review)
Jeff: 361’s newest large stacked trainer was a bit of a shock. Its stack is a little lower than UB5X, and it weighs about half an ounce less, but still has more than enough cushioning. The UB5X midsole is more dynamic though, with a noticeable bounce that the Eleos doesn’t have - but the Eleos does have a softer landing. Both will work well as a daily trainer, but the adidas’ performance bias will give it the edge for faster runners or faster runs. That said, the Eleos is a substantial $35 less, and has a substantially better fitting upper.
ASICS Nimbus 26 (RTR Review)
Jeff: ASICS big cushioned trainer is more comfort oriented than the UB5X with a noticeable sink in, but not nearly the bounce and performance ride the adidas has. The upper has a better hold than the UB5X, and is much more plush.
Brooks Ghost Max 2 (RTR Review)
Jeff: This one surprised me in how similar to each other they run. The Brooks’ DNA Loft v3 midsole feels a little more substantial, especially in the forefoot, and it has a better fitting upper. It does tip the scales about an ounce heavier, but neither feels substantially softer or bouncier than the other, mostly just a little more cushion at the expense of a little more weight - but you can’t go wrong with either.
Mizuno Neo Vista (RTR Review)
Jeff: The Mizuno has a similar minimalistic knit upper, though it is much tighter fitting than the adidas. The midsole is both softer and bouncier, and even higher stacked, with a plate to give it extra stability. The UB5X is a great daily trainer, while the Neo Vista can be that, but shines at even faster efforts.
Europe only: use RTR code RTR5ALL for 5% off all products, even sale products
2 comments:
Hi Sam,
I was wondering if you could post a "best trails in new england or new hampshire" article ? ;)
I'm going on vacation in your area next month and I could use some help!
I'm planning on hiking in these areas :
Mt Washington
Flume Gorge
Mt Lafayette
Acadia national park trails
Camden Hills Stake Park
Wolfe's Neck Woods State Park
Marginal Way Walkway
Shining Sea Bikeway
Cape Cod National Seashore
I was thinking about Mt Katahdin (Baxter State Park) but I think I'll do it on another trip.
We will be mostly walking but I might run while they bike ;)
Looking mostly for the most scenic trails, under 15km ideally.
Thanks,
Jp
Following
Post a Comment