Thursday, October 29, 2020

ASICS GEL-Nimbus Lite 2 Initial Video Review, Details and Comparisons

Article by Sam Winebaum

ASICS GEL-Nimbus Lite 2 ($150)

Just in I had to take the ASICS GEL-Nimbus Lite 2 out in miserable rainy cold conditions for a first run. At in 9.52 oz /270g US9 with the same stack and 10mm drop as the first version and a touch lighter at 9.52 oz /270g US9.

Update: Read our full multi tester review with 11 comparisons HERE 

It has a completely new midsole geometry but the same FlyteFoam as v1, and has a new outsole and upper. It is now a very different shoe, all good by me!  Find out how in the video with comparisons to Skechers Ride 8, Saucony Ride 13, ASICS Nova and Dynablast. It also has a strong sustainability story as well that I cover in the video. Releasing Dec. $150.

 Watch Sam's Video Review

Read reviewers' full run bios here
The product reviewed was provided at no charge for testing. The opinions herein are the authors'.

Comments and Questions Welcome Below!
Please let us know mileage, paces, race distances, and current preferred shoes

RoadTrailRun receives a commission on purchases at the stores below.
Your purchases help support RoadTrailRun. Thanks!

RUNNING WAREHOUSE
USA  Men's & Women's SHOP HERE
FREE 2 Day Shipping EASY No Sweat Returns
EUROPE Men's & Women's SHOP HERE
AUSTRALIA Men's & Women's SHOP HERE

HOLABIRD SPORTS
Men's & Women's SHOP HERE
Free Shipping on most orders over $40

ROADRUNNER SPORTS
Men's & Women's SHOP HERE
Join VIP Family, Get Free Shipping and 15% in VIP Benefits on every order, Details here

REI 
Men's & Women's  SHOP HERE

AMAZON  
Men's & Women's SHOP HERE

WATCH OUR YOUTUBE REVIEWS ON THE ROADTRAILRUN CHANNEL



Please Like and Follow RoadTrailRun
Facebook: RoadTrailRun.com  Instagram: @roadtrailrun
Twitter: @RoadTrailRun You Tube: @RoadTrailRun

Tuesday, October 27, 2020

ASICS GEL-Kayano Lite Multi Tester Review: Reimagining a Classic! Simple, Modern, Consistent Riding, and more Sustainable

Article by Sally Reiley,, Michael Ellenberger, and Sam Winebaum

ASICS GEL-Kayano Lite ($160)



Introduction

Sam: The Kayano Lite is the 2nd model in a series from ASICS (after the Nimbus Lite) which reimagines ASICS stalwart classics in new, modern, and lighter ways while retaining their essential focus and DNA.


As such the Kayano Lite is a new take on the venerable and fine Kayano in its classic edition at number 27, the 2nd longest "run" of any run shoe. A light on the overt stability elements with elaborate construction all of our testers (almost always neutral fans) really enjoyed the Kayano 27 so instead of "messing" with what is clearly a long time trusted favorite ASICS did something different.

You saw the word “elaborate” above. Well the Kayano Lite is designed to provide stability without being elaborate. While I may be missing something, the Kayano Lite may be the first “stability” oriented shoe made from a single density of foam without posts (GT 2000 and many others) or firmer sidewalls and mid foot plates (Kayano 27), or above the midsole “rails” (Brooks, Nike, Altra). Beyond a “Twist GEL” unit at the forefoot, a small disc at the big toe metatarsal, there is only a single density Flyte Foam midsole here.


The Kayano achieves its stabilizing through an inherently broad on the ground geometry and more vertical medial midsole sidewalls. Unseen is a new 3D Space Construction of low pillars molded into the midsole at the heel and forefoot which deform according to the runner’s individual strike patterns.

The result of this far simpler construction should be a very consistent, very well cushioned feel under foot with no add on elements. As far as the Lite part,the Kayano Lite is indeed lighter than the Kayano 27 and comes in at approximately 10.2 oz in a US9 based on our samples so almost a full ounce 28g lighter than the Kayano 27 and this weight reduction clearly felt on the run.


Topped with an engineered mesh upper with recycled content and with a cellulose nanofiber flavor of Flytefoam the Kayano Lite also has a lighter impact on the earth/ sustainability story as approximately 80% of the materials in the upper are recycled material and the midsole uses 15-20% cellulose nanofiber repurposed from sugarcane manufacturing. All packaging is 100% recycled material and starting in 2021 all ASICS shoe packaging, and for millions of pairs, will be made of 100% recycled materials.   


Stats

Approx. weight: men's 10.2 oz / 289g (US9)  /  women's 8.9 oz / 251g (US8)

  Samples: men’s US8.5 9.88 oz / 280g

                  women’s US8 8.9 oz / 251 g 

Stack Heights: men’s 31/21, 10mm drop, women’s 33/21, 11 mm drop

Available Now  $160



Pros:

Sam/Michael: Very unobtrusive stability from single density foam and an inherently stable broad geometry

Sam/Sally: Superb well locked down upper that is plush but not overly so.

Sam/Sally: Very well cushioned with a consistent heel to toe feel

Sam/Michael/Sally: Admirable sustainability story.


Cons:

Sam/Sally: A bit flat, slappy and stiff at front of midfoot especially when new. Could use more segmentation and deeper decoupling there.

Michael/Sam: Ride is mediocre at faster paces

Sam/Sally: Heel rubber a bit firm and thick in feel while forefoot rubber a bit soft and lacking in pop.

Michael: Tongue and lacing is slightly ”puffy,” impairing lockdown.

Sam/Sally: Take several runs to break in and find their groove,


Tester Profiles

Sally is a lifelong runner and mother of five who ran her first marathon at age 54, and has now run the past seven Boston Marathons and one Chicago, with a 2017 Boston PR of 3:29, good for 8th in her age group. Along the way she has raised over $240,000 for Massachusetts Eye and Ear Hospital running with Team Eye and Ear. A relative newbie to road racing, she has achieved All-American status in the 10K (44:04) and 5K. To commemorate her 60th birthday she ran the NYC Marathon in November finishing 2nd in her age group with a PR time of 3:28:39.  Sally is a compact (petite) runner at 5’2’’ and 105 pounds.


Michael is a 2019 graduate of Northwestern University Law School in Chicago, with an interest in patent and intellectual property law. Prior to law school, he competed collegiately at Washington University in St. Louis (10,000m PR of 30:21). He recently finished 2nd at the Chicago Half-Marathon in a PR of 67:43, and was the top Illinois finisher in the 2017 Boston Marathon (2:33:03, 82nd overall). He recently secured a 2:31 marathon PR at the Austin Marathon. 


Sam is the Editor and Founder of Road Trail Run. He is 63 with a 2018 3:40 Boston qualifier. Sam has been running for over 45 years and has a 2:28 marathon PR. These days he runs halves in the just sub 1:40 range training 30-40 miles per week mostly at moderate paces on the roads and trails of New Hampshire and Utah. He is 5'10" tall and weighs about 163 lbs.

Monday, October 26, 2020

Brooks Run Visible Collection Multi Tester Review: Carbonite Powered High Reflectivity & 24/7 Visibility

Article by Sally Reiley, John Tribbia and Sam Winebaum

Brooks Run Visible Collection

Sally, John, and Sam set out to test the men's Carbonite Short Sleeve, 7” 2-1 Short, men and women's Carbonite Jackets, and the women's ⅞ CarboniteTight, all part of Brooks’ new Run Visible Collection.

Sunday, October 25, 2020

ASICS Roadblast - As much as necessary, as little as possible!

Article by Nils Scharff

ASICS Roadblast ($90)


Editor's Note: Hot on the heels of his German language review of the Roadblast Nils was kind enough to translate his review to English.

Introduction

When the ASICS Novablast hit the market in spring, it quickly became clear thatFlytefoam Blast midsole material has great potential. The Novablast with its irrepressible bounce has given many runners a lot of joy. Unfortunately, it was too unstable for me. The thick, soft midsole in combination with the rather wide fit was too much for my overpronating right ankle. 

So I was all the more pleased when ASICS announced two more models with Blast, Dynablast and Roadblast. Maybe ASICS will manage to tame the magic of the new midsole material in these shoes and make it runnable for me!? 


Fortunately, ASICS made the Roadblast available to me for this test to get to the bottom of this question! The Roadblast is the lightest cushioned shoe in the product family and is therefore presumably suitable for faster runs. At the same time, with an retail of just $90, it is a budget option on the running shoe market. In the course of this test I will find out whether it is also a buy recommendation.


Specs

Weight:

  Official: 8.7oz (men US9) / 7.4oz (women US8)

  Test shoe: 9 oz (men EU 44 / US 10)

Drop: Men 10mm (14mm forefoot / 24 mm heel)

Release: Available now. $90


Pros:

Simple, but comfortable and effective upper!

Light at 8.7 oz / 247g

Slight bounce of the great midsole material, especially in the heel!

The instability of the Novablast is gone!

Cool casual design that you can wear on the track as well as in the gym or in town!

Price!

Cons:

I would like a bit more cushioning in the forefoot!

Comparable shoes usually weigh a little less (but also cost a little more)!


Tester: Nils Scharff

I am 30 years old, born in Kassel, married to a wonderful wife and have been making Heilbronn and its surrounding vineyards unsafe for 5 years now. I've done all sorts of sports my entire life, often 5-7 times a week. In addition to running, climbing and bouldering have been my sports for several years. I've only seen myself as a runner for three years. It all started with a company run that I didn't want to start completely unprepared. At that point I just didn't stop. In 2017 it was "only" just under 1000 kilometers, in 2018 twice as much, in 2019 already three times as much. During all these kilometers, it is important to me, whether on the trail or on the road, to switch off and exercise in nature. You will rarely see me on the treadmill or with headphones. In the meantime I have run four marathons, I set up the PB of 3: 14: 49h this year despite Corona as part of a #stayathomemarathon. In competitions I basically run all distances from 5km (17: 41min), 10km (37: 33min) over half marathons (1: 25: 07h) to the marathon. However, after all of my planned competitions were canceled this summer, I reoriented myself a little and registered for my first trail marathon.

Saturday, October 24, 2020

Testbericht: ASICS Roadblast - So viel wie nötig, so wenig wie möglich!

Article by Nils Scharff

Link zu allen RTR-Testberichten: HIER


ASICS Roadblast (100€)


Einleitung

Als im Frühjahr der ASICS Novablast auf den Markt gekommen ist, war schnell klar: Das Mittelsohlenmaterial Flytefoam Blast hat großes Potential. Der Novablast mit seinem unbändigen Bounce hat vielen Läufern sehr viel Freude bereitet. Leider war er für mich zu instabil. Die dicke, weiche Mittelsohle war in Kombination mit der eher weiten Passform zu viel für meinen überpronierenden, rechten Knöchel. Umso mehr habe ich mich gefreut, als ASICS mit Dynablast und Roadblast zwei weitere Modelle angekündigt hat, die Flytefoam Blast nutzen. Vielleicht schafft ASICS es ja in diesen Schuhen die Magie des neuen Mittelsohlenmaterials zu bändigen und so für mich laufbar zu machen!? Glücklicherweise hat mir ASICS den Roadblast für diesen Test zur Verfügung gestellt, um dieser Frage auf den Grund zu gehen! Der Roadblast ist der am leichtesten gedämpfte Schuh der Produktfamilie und somit mutmaßlich für schnellere Läufe geeignet. Gleichzeitig ist er mit einer UVP von lediglich 100€ eine Budgetoption auf dem Laufschuhmarkt. Ob er somit auch eine Kaufempfehlung ist, werde ich im Laufe dieses Tests herausfinden.


Pro & Contra

Pro:

Simples, aber bequemes und effektives Obermaterial!

Leicht!

Leichter Bounce des tollen Mittelsohlenmaterials, vor allem in der Ferse!

Die Instabilität des Novablast ist verschwunden!

Cooles casual Design, das man auf der Laufstrecke genauso wie im Gym oder in der Stadt tragen kann!

Preis!

Contra:

Es dürfte ein bisschen mehr Dämpfung im Vorfuß sein!

Vergleichbare Schuhe wiegen meist etwas weniger (kosten aber auch etwas mehr)!

Friday, October 23, 2020

Hoka ONE ONE Challenger ATR 6 Multi-Tester Review

Article by Jeff Valliere, John Tribbia, Jeff Beck, and Canice Harte

Hoka ONE ONE Challenger ATR 6 ($130)


Introduction


Jeff V:  The Challenger ATR 6 has been revamped from the ground up, with a completely new Unifi Repreve yarn upper derived from post consumer waste plastic, a CMEVA midsole and slightly retooled (but essentially the same) zonal rubber outsole.  A Gore-Tex version is also available (review soon).


Ultimately, the ATR 6 is very familiar in feel with a refreshed modern look and much improved upper fit.


John: After having tested the Hoka Torrent 2 earlier this year, I felt compelled to compare that shoe to the ATR 6, because they have similar comfort but completely different performance orientation. The Torrent 2 has a very comfortable fit, has great protection, and is lightweight. The ATR 6, in my opinion, is a complement to the Torrent by giving a less technically oriented, comfortably cushioned, and overall feel-good shoe to put on your foot. Without a doubt, the Torrent’s intended purpose are those ambitious days of technical trail running and the ATR 6 is best for the cruisy, mellow days, on the less technical off- or dirt road terrain. The fit is true to size. My slightly narrow foot feels secure and the cushion is extremely comfortable.


Jeff B: Hoka’s jack of all trades, the Challenger is their most vanilla, middle-of-the-road shoe, and that’s not bad. The 6 revamps a number of a little things from the 5, which was a pretty great shoe in its own right, and the result is a shoe that feels familiar and different at the same time. Does that mean it’s going to be all things to all people? Well, no, and I don’t think most runners will find it great at everything, but it is pretty good at most running terrain - and that’s worth writing home about.


Stats

Official Weight: 9.8 oz / 279g  US9

  Samples: US men’s size 10: 10.5 oz./ 299g US Men’s Size 10.5: 11 oz / 312 g

Stack Height: 29mm /24mm, 5mm drop

Available November 2020. $130

Pros:

Jeff V / Canice:  Light weight, versatility, fit/security, comfort

John: Cushion, downhill ride, lightweight

Jeff B: Upper overhaul is great, midsole and outsole are as good, if not better than last version


Cons:

Jeff V / Canice:  Traction, a bit unstable in technical terrain

John: Dampened midsole rebound feel, traction

Jeff B: Narrow toebox.. my old nemesis, surprisingly little flex in the forefoot for the stack height


Tester Profiles

Jeff V.  runs mostly on very steep technical terrain above Boulder often challenging well known local FKT's. 

Canice is a 2 x finisher of the Wasatch 100, the Bear 100, Moab 100, Western States 100, and Leadman as well as many other ultras. He regularly competes in Expedition Length Adventure races with his longest race to date 600 miles as well as in traditional road races and triathlons.

Jeff B. is the token slow runner of the RTR lineup as such his viewpoints on shoe and gear can differ from those who routinely finish marathons in three hours or less. Jeff runs 40 miles per week, both roads and desert trails in Phoenix, Arizona. He has a PR's of 4:07 marathon and 5K at 23:39. In December he raced his first 50 mile trail ultra. 

John Tribbia (5' 6", 130lbs) is a former sponsored mountain/trail runner who has run with La Sportiva, Brooks/Fleet Feet, Pearl Izumi, and Salomon. Even though he competes less frequently these days, you can still find John enjoying the daily grind of running on any surface, though his favorite terrain is 30-40% grade climbs. He has won races such as America's Uphill, Imogene Pass Run, and the US Skyrunner Vertical Kilometer Series; and he's held several FKTs on several iconic mountains in Boulder, Colorado and Salt Lake City, Utah. If you follow him on Strava, you'll notice he runs at varying paces between 5 minutes/mile to 12 minutes/mile before the break of dawn almost everyday.

Thursday, October 22, 2020

Hoka ONE ONE Mach 4 Multi Tester Review: A Delightful, Light, First Class Ride. Inviting and Enjoyable in Every Way!

Article by Dominique Winebaum, Joost De Raeymaeker, Peter Stuart, Derek Li, Ryan Eiler Jacob Brady and Sam Winebaum

Hoka ONE ONE Mach 4 ($130)


Editor Note: The Mach 4 doesn’t launch until March 2021 but is one of those shoes which so captivated our testers that they had to show and tell, and now!


Introduction

Dominique: I am excited to be testing several pairs of shoes (running and hiking) from the HOKA Spring Collection 2021 -- plenty of novelties to boost my stride!  


Based on the characteristics of the ride, HOKA has classified its line of footwear into three categories: Fly, Glide, and Sky.  Testing the Mach 4 I get to experience the Fly ride, which is characterized for its “responsive cushion” and “energetic ride.”  


This is my first introduction to a Mach model and it was love at the first step. It may be hard to go back to the Arahi 5, which I am also testing, after running in the Mach 4.  I presently have an undiagnosed sore heel that is improving with rest but made worse by running, though the pain did not resurface running in the Mach 4, as it did running in the Arahi 5, which is much firmer.

Joost: As I wrote in my Rocket X review (RTR Review), these are my first ever couple of HOKA shoes and I don’t know if I’m lucky to get the great ones, but they’ve been a success for me so far. They are very different shoes in feel and purpose, but both belong to the faster Fly line. The Mach 4 is a fast everyday trainer for logging long miles. For price and purpose, its place in the lineup is comparable to the Nike Pegasus 37, the Saucony Ride 13 or the Reebok Floatride Symmetros. The feel of the Mach 4 is quite different, though. Read on for more info and comparisons.


Peter: The Mach 3 was not my favorite shoe. It was pretty hard and unforgiving for a Hoka--in fact it was pretty hard and unforgiving period. It was fine, but not particularly fun to run in. The Mach 4 is softer, more comfortable and better looking. 


Derek: The last Mach I used was Mach 2. It was a pretty good all-around shoe for me, if a little on the flat-feeling side. I missed out on Mach 3, but I’m glad I caught the boat for the Mach 4. While the fit is still fairly similar to the Mach 2, the Mach 4 looks and feels completely different! As Peter has said, it is now a much softer shoe than prior versions. Is that a good thing? Read on to find out the good, the bad, and the bouncy. 


Sam: Been waiting and waiting… Ever since the first Mach with its rubberized foam I thought there would be a worthy replacement for the 2014 Huaka, an all around even trails shoe with a lively bounce and stable manners from its  full RMAT rubberized foam midsole and a few patches of rubber but no Mach or other Hoka got that magic back.  


Machs have been firmer, relatively low stack for a Hoka and definitely not much fun.  While Cliftons have improved in stability and rocker geometry over time, they remained,even in the 7 a shoe that I had trouble flowing with. Adding more stack to the Mach, now equivalent to the Clifton's, and softer new foam and what appeared to be a new rocker geometry caught my attention as did the Swallow Tail. 

The Mach tail and associated outrigger are a new take on the outrigger to cushion landings and lever the foot forward first seen in the radical trail TenNine and as an extreme Swallow Tail combined with a Carbon Bow in the Deckers Lab (parent of Hoka’s innovation lab)  KD-S 21 “concept shoe” where it was, if clearly effective, also extreme and overdone for pure run purposes. 

The Clifton Edge of earlier this year also included an outrigger heel that was broader and further protruding than in the Mach's (back weighting the shoe). Clearly Hoka and Deckers Lab believe the concept has merit and have very rapidly evolved it in less than a year with now a tuned down tail in the Mach 4.


With a weight at barely 8 oz and that full 29mm/ 24mm stack, I was eager to see where this totally modern, new school Hoka fit.  I suspected it would for sure improve on the Mach and likely be a smoother running and lighter alternative to the Clifton.

Ryan: There were mixed reviews about the Mach 3, and so I didn’t set the bar as high as I should have for this iteration. The folks at Hoka must actually be listening to customer feedback! Hoka has been openly experimenting with a variety of flared and extended heels, so I was curious to see how this particular swallowtail shape affected the ride. It’s impressively lightweight for a shoe that by appearance should weigh 12oz. Looking at the spec sheet, I expected a bulky, overly-firm trainer, but it turns out that my initial impressions were far from the truth.


Jacob: The Mach is Hoka’s lightweight, uptempo/daily trainer. Previous iterations were lower stack and firmer—not classic Hokas

. Version 4 is a dramatic redesign, gaining in stack height, softness, and upper structure, while declining in weight! I really enjoyed the Mach 3 and even a year later, still run in it every couple of weeks. With version 4 Hoka has changed the two things I liked most about the Mach 3: the firm but well cushioned underfoot feel and the thin, unstructured jacquard mesh upper. I was curious to experience the pros and cons of these changes—let’s check it out.


Sunday, October 18, 2020

Hoka ONE ONE Rocket X Multi Tester Review: The Most Traditional Riding & Stable Super Shoe

Article by Joost De Raeymaeker, Derek Li, Michael Ellenberger, Sally Reiley and Sam Winebaum


Hoka One One Rocket X ($180)

s


Introduction

Joost: I hate to admit it, but this is my first actual pair of HOKA running shoes. Well, actually Rocket X and a pair of Mach 4 I also got in for testing. Apparently, they are also very unlike other maximum cushioned HOKA shoes out there, so the fact that I haven’t run in something like the Clifton can actually be seen as an advantage, since I will only be judging the shoe for what it is, and not for something that a HOKA shoe is perceived to somehow have to be to qualify as a HOKA.

A couple of years ago, before all the supershoes, and in the aftermath of the barefoot and minimalist waves, I was doing one of those hard marathon sessions of over 35km (Daniels Elite 12 week program can be really tough) in my trusty pair of Nike Streak Flyknit when at the end of the session, I ran into a tall friend who seemed a lot taller still. On his feet was a pair of what I thought were humongous shoes: the original Clifton. He seemed to be really enjoying them. Since I was still over on the other side of the fence about cushioning, I didn’t give them much thought.


Fast forward to 2020 and World Athletics actually had to put a legal limit on stack height. This pair of Rocket X, with its 30mm height at the heel is actually a full centimeter lower than the Alphafly and the Adios Pro. Things have really changed!


In the Hoka catalog featuring US female Olympic Marathon trials winner Aliphine Tuliamuk I got a look at how Hoka divides its offerings into 3 distinct categories: Fly, Glide and Sky. They are pretty self-explanatory, with Fly being the collection of up-tempo shoes, Glide being the shoes with the “smoothest, softest ride” and Sky the trail and mountain collection. 


The Rocket X sits at the top of the Fly category, being HOKA’s fastest and lightest plated racer. The carbon plate itself is the same as in the Carbon X, the brand’s endurance racer, but the foam is the lightest HOKA has ever made, the upper a breathable mesh and it has a rubberized outsole to further save weight. I got the White/Diva Blue colorway, which looks great. How does it ride? Read on.


Michael: We may have even said this before, but I think this time around really, really completes the first wave of super shoes from the major brands. Heck, Nike and Brooks have snuck in a couple revisions in the time since the window “opened,” but now Hoka One One joins Nike, Brooks, Saucony, ASICS, New Balance, Adidas, Skechers, and On with a formal carbon-plated flagship. And yes, one may argue that Hoka actually opened the wave with their initial Carbon Rocket and Carbon X back in early 2019 after the Vaporfly, and if that’s your take, then… I suppose we’re opening the third test window now!  Either way, the Rocket X is here, and ready to roll, sitting near the middle line top left quadrant  and leaning marathon in my graphic below.


Derek: I believe the Rocket X actually had a very limited release around the time of the US marathon Olympic Trials back in February but nobody really sat down to do a formal review of the shoes. It’s been a good eight months since that race, and we are finally seeing the commercial release of the Rocket X. Jim Walmsley called this shoe the “Trials Dagger” and he actually finished pretty high up in that race considering his Ultra running background, so this shoe already had some street credibility going for it. I actually have a bit of bias here. I got to do a couple of strides in the Rocket X back in early September. Some of my friends here in Singapore are Hoka sponsored athletes and they have been using the Rocket X for a couple of months now. I managed to try out the Rocket X in a US10 (my usual size is US9.5) for a couple of minutes. The shoe did not wow me at the time, but it could have been because it already had some miles in it. How will a fresh pair feel? I’m excited to find out. 


Sam: I was curious to test the Rocket X having quite liked the Carbon Rocket despite its relatively flat 1mm drop profile and firmer ride which never left my legs beat up even after longer runs. Carbon X basically broadened the Carbon Rocket’s underfoot platform and went to 5mm drop but was heavy for a racer.  


I was surprised that while a very “respectable” 30mm / 25mm stack Hoka’s contender, after all from the original max cushion brand well and before any other went max, didn’t push the stack closer to the IAAF limits of 40mm as say Nike, adidas, Saucony, and Brooks have. It is also on a relatively narrow underfoot platform for Hoka and is at a decent but not earth shattering low weight of 7.5 oz. With compression molded light EVA it seems the foam while softer than the Carbon Rocket is fairly conventional, more like adidas Lightstrike Pro than Zoom X or PWRUN PB. 


Sally: I have been enjoying testing the numerous supershoes that have been released in this race-limited year of 2020, so I was thrilled to get the opportunity to test out the Rocket X, Hoka’s entry. I am still a Hoka rookie, with an embarrassing anti-Hoka bias caused by my first Hoka experience: I went for a run in the Bondi 6, and equated the experience to running in ski boots. I was NOT impressed. I have a narrow woman’s foot and “petite” legs (okay, my brother calls me “Birdlegs”) and the typical Hoka looks huge on me. But the Rocket X is not your typical Hoka: it actually looks more like a traditional shoe than the other carbon-plated race shoes. The test will be in the run! 

Pros:

Michael/Sally/Sam/Derek/Joost: energetic and stable ride without a bouncy trampoline feel 

Michael/Sam/Joost: very stable, more traditional riding “super shoe”

Derek/Joost/Sam: comfortable easy fit, excellent upper

Sally/Joost: great looking classic aesthetic (untypically Hoka in looks!)

Sally/Sam: very subtle plated rocker sensation

Sam: Plate location, just above outsole then a thin layer of foam, masks any harshness

Sam: far less “low” at the heel feeling than 1mm drop Carbon Rocket 

Joost: The reflective element at the heel is a nice touch lots of brands are no longer applying.


Cons:

Derek/Sam: Weight is “OK” but for the 30/25 stack (less stack than most other super shoes) is up there 

Joost/Sam: No real “meta-rocker” feel. Requires strong knee drive up and forward to activate

Joost/Sam/Sally: Laces are way too long

Sam: Fairly firm overall feel underfoot, if well cushioned. Wish for a touch more rebound and bounce from the midsole.

Sally: Tongue a bit short, especially when you need to use extra lace loop to secure heel hold      (need more protection at ankle)

Michael: Fit concerns, especially at ankle and with lacing

Sally: Wish they had gender specific sizing as mens lasts tend to be wider, and I have a particularly narrow women’s foot

Michael: Heavy and not particularly bouncy give it a more performance trainer feel than true racer