Artikel von Markus Zinkl
Veil XP Wasserdichter Rucksack 30L (€170,00)
Artikel von Nils Scharff
Berlin Tee (86€), Berlin Singlet (86€) & Berlin Shorts (86€)
Article by Jen Schmidt, Peter Stuart, Ben David, and Michael Ellenberger
Hoka Mach X 3 ($190)
Artikel von Nils Scharff
Nike Structure 26 (140€)
Einleitung
Nike hat Anfang des Jahres angekündigt, seine Trainingsschuhe künftig in drei klar definierte Produktlinien („Silos“) zu unterteilen:
Pegasus: Der klassische Daily Trainer für die breite Masse.
Vomero: Die maximal gedämpfte Trainingsalternative.
Structure: Der Stabilitätsschuh für Läufer:innen, die zusätzlichen Support benötigen.
Innerhalb dieser Silos gibt es jeweils ein sogenanntes Hero-Modell – also die Standardversion des jeweiligen Schuhs – sowie ergänzend eine Plus- und eine Premium-Variante. Während die Plus-Modelle durch weichere, reaktivere Schäume wie ZoomX eine neue Dämpfungsdimension eröffnen, bringen die Premium-Modelle zusätzliche Technologien ins Spiel, etwa durch den Einsatz von Zoom Air-Elementen („Zoom Pods“), wie man sie bereits aus dem Pegasus Premium oder Vomero Premium kennt.
Im Fall des Nike Structure 26 liegt bislang nur das Hero-Modell vor – und genau dieses habe ich getestet. Der Schuh richtet sich laut Nike an Läufer:innen, die „mehr Halt bei jedem Schritt“ benötigen. Schon der Schuhkarton trägt prominent den Slogan „Run Supported“ – und genau darum geht es beim Structure: Stabilität und Führung.
Ich persönlich laufe seit Jahren überwiegend in neutralen Schuhen – früher habe ich Stabilitätsmodelle getragen, als ich mit dem Laufen begonnen habe. Heute bevorzuge ich neutrale oder stabile neutrale Modelle, die nicht aktiv in meinen Bewegungsapparat eingreifen. Umso spannender ist für mich die Frage, ob der Structure 26 als klassischer Stabilitätsschuh Einschränkungen oder sogar Probleme verursacht – oder ob er sich auch für Läufer:innen eignet, die eigentlich keine Unterstützung benötigen.
Im folgenden Bericht erfahrt ihr, wie sich der Schuh im Training geschlagen hat, welche Technologien zum Einsatz kommen und ob der Structure 26 auch für „Neutral-Läufer:innen“ eine interessante Option sein kann.
Article by Sam Winebaum
Kailas FUGA EX 330 (180€,$199.)
Article by Jeremy Marie
SunGod FORTY2s™ - Running Sunglasses ($140/135€/110GBP)
Article by Jeff Valliere
Arapahoe Basin Cirque Series - September 6th, 2025
Article de Jeremy Marie
On Cloudsurfer Max (190€)
Article by Courtney Kelly and Kurt Biesemans
On Cloudultra 3 (190USD, 200EUR, 180GBP, 250CHF)
Article by Ben David and Sam Winebaum
Tracksmith Eliot Range ($240)
Article by Courtney Kelly and Sally Reiley
Tracksmith Women’s Fall 2025 Overland Apparel Collection
Artikel von Maren Müller und Ingrid Zasa
Puma Deviate NITRO Elite 3 (229,98€)
Article by Jen Schmidt, Sam Winebaum, Jeff Valliere, Adam Glueck, and Dom Layfield
Hoka Rocket X Trail ($250)
Article by Peter Stuart and Sally Reiley
ASICS Megablast ($225)
Nank (Naenka) Runner 4 Bone
Conduction Headphones ($80)
Tech and Features
The Runner 4 keeps things simple but smart. They’re
super light, about 26 grams, so once they’re on you barely notice them.
You get both Bluetooth for streaming and 16 GB of
built-in MP4 storage, which means you can load up a bunch of songs and head out
without your phone. Battery life runs close to 8 hours, plenty for long runs or
a full gym day.
Charging and adding music is easy—the magnetic cable
just snaps in, and your computer sees it like a little flash drive so you can
drag songs right over.
Usability Fit
The fit is really comfortable and secure. I didn’t
have any issues with the neckband at all, it just sat in place and I forgot
about it. No hot spots either, even with sunglasses or a hat on.
I tested them on runs, during strength training, and
even through a cardio circuit just to see if they’d slip or bug me. They didn’t
move once and never got in the way, no matter what I was doing.
Performance
Out on a run, I like that I can still hear what’s
happening around me—cars, bikes sneaking up, even birds when I’m on the
trail—while my playlist rolls in the background.
The sound isn’t big on bass, but it’s clear enough for
workouts and voices come through sharp. Battery life felt close to the 8-hour
mark, even with the volume turned up. Calls sound fine unless you’re standing
in heavy traffic.
And every once in a while you’ll feel a little
vibration on the cheekbones when the beat hits, but that’s just part of bone
conduction and it never threw me off.
Conclusions
All in all, the Runner 4 does exactly what it
promises: it gives you music without blocking out the world around you. They’re
light, comfortable, and stay locked in place whether you’re running, lifting,
or just moving through a busy street.
If being able to hear your surroundings is a
priority and you still want reliable headphones for training, these are an easy
recommendation.
Comparisons
Compared to the Shokz OpenRun Pro 2, the Runner 4
doesn’t have quite the same sound polish or extra-long battery, but it makes up
for it with built-in storage and a lower price tag. If you just want great
sound and don’t care about storing music on the headphones, Shokz might edge it
out. But if leaving your phone at home and still having music ready sounds
appealing, the Runner 4 is the more flexible choice.
Shop for Runner 4
Nank (Naenka) Runner 4 Bone
Conduction Headphone
Jana Herzgova took up running
in 2016, after a back injury. Prior to that she was a speed skater, but due to
back pain and doctor's recommendation, she transitioned into running. Since
then, starting with shorter ultra distance races she quickly evolved into an
avid long distance and unsupported mountain runner. She also loves to take on
challenges/races in arctic and subarctic climates, mainly in unsupported and
semi-self supported style. She currently lives in Utah/Wyoming.
Thanks for reading our review!
Shopping at our partners is much appreciated and helps
support RoadTrailRun
Samples were provided at no charge for review
purposes. No compensation was provided by brands for writing this article.
RoadTrail Run does have affiliate partnerships and may earn commission on
products purchased via shopping links in this article. These partnerships do
not influence our editorial content. The opinions herein are entirely the
authors'.
Article by Jen Schmidt,
Hoka Mach X 3 ($190)
Jen's review is updated with 3 other testers joining here
Article by Jen Schmidt, Sam Winebaum, Jeff Valliere, Adam Glueck and Dom Layfield
Hoka Rocket X Trail ($250)
Due to formatting issues with this version of the review we have reposted it here
Artikel von Nils Scharff
adidas Adizero Takumi Sen 11 (200€)