Friday, November 20, 2015

Review-Altra Running The One 2.5. Easy Rider

Review by Peter Stuart

Altra The One 2.5 (Altra shoe names must be really confusing when they talk about them on the phone) is a 6.3 Oz, Zero Drop, neutral shoe that Altra describes as built for speed, without sacrificing the comfort needed to maintain that speed through the finish line”. Technologies touted on their website are FootShapeTM toe box, A-BoundTM cushioning, InnerFlexTM technology and Zero DropTM platform. Who knew that Altra literally has the patent on Zero DropTM? The stack height is 23mm across the board. There’s not a ton to these shoes, but they’re super fun to run in. They are slipper-like in fit, have just a couple of well placed patches of harder rubber and lots of exposed EVA.

Upper and Fit:



Okay, they look a little like bowling shoes. Let’s just get that out of the way. That said, they fit me really well.

Altra Impulse Review: Stability? Zero Drop? Newton in Reverse?

Review by Peter Stuart

Editor's NoteThe Altra Impulse is an 8.6 oz 243 gram men's 9,  7 oz, 198g women's 8 Zero Drop light, cushioned "stability" shoe with a 23 heel/23mm forefoot. $120, on sale now. I previously reviewed the Impulse and loved it. Peter agrees. One of the finest shoes of the year for both of us and we run in a lot of shoes!

This is another take on the Altra Impulse—as Sam has already done a pretty thorough review of them. See Sam’s review for tech specs and some more detail.


First impression and second chances:
I put these on, ran down the block and put them back in the box to send back to Running Warehouse. They felt a little “slappy” and stiff to me and I didn’t think they’d be a good shoe for me. The fit of the upper was fine, but the road feel was so far from what I’ve been running in lately (barely there flexible soft(ish) shoes). This shoe was a brick! Or was it? For some reason I held on to them and decided to give them a run or two. Boy Howdy am I glad I did!
A funny thing happened about three miles into my first real run in the Impulse. The forefoot gave a little and the magic of this shoe started to reveal itself. It’s all about the Stabili-Pods and the InnerFlex—which sort of take the concepts found in the ON shoes and in Newtons and make a big, springy step forward.

Upper and Fit:
This was my first Altra. Frankly the Platypus shape has always kind of steered me in the other direction. I got used to the more “foot-shaped” look through the Topo Magnifly, and so was a little more willing to try these out. To be fair, the design on the Altra seems to be getting better and these are pretty good looking shoes. Still a bit odd looking to me, but I’ll forgive it for the ride.
These shoes came to me with the “lace lock” formation ready to go—the laces looped back through themselves at the top two eyelets. I found them to fit fine. Nice and snug in the heel, locked in on the midfoot and plenty of room for toe splay. These were a lace up and run shoe for me—no annoying stops for readjustment. I did have to avoid the temptation to tie the laces tighter—but it’s really a visual issue. The asymmetric lacing just looks different. I’ve had no issues with blisters, chafing or irritation. These feel good on my feet.

Midsole and Outsole:
Again, see Sam’s review for the details. Here’s my subjective take on the midsole and outsole. LOVE IT.
Okay, so why do i love it? The combination of the Stabili-Pods and the InnerFlex make for a really special ride. The slits in the side of the outsole allow the front of the shoe to compress into the empty space between the outsole and the midsole. It’s sort of a lugless Newton—or at least an inverse Newton. It also reminds me a bit of the ON shoes (Except way more stable underfoot and without the imploding pods I experienced with ONs).
Editor's Note: Peter's Impulse show almost no wear at 100 miles. Mine at 134 miles also almost like new.
Photo Credit: Peter Stuart


If you land in the sweet spot (by aiming for the pods) you get a really nice compression of the front of the shoe and then a great spring back. This is especially noticeable at speed or, strangely enough, on uphills. Even when I’m not hitting the pods directly I find the ride of the

Impulse to be super smooth. This is one of the things about the Altra that I prefer to the Newton. Later in runs when my form suffers a bit and I’m not hitting the sweet spot as regularly I start to feel that I’m fighting against the Newton Lugs—with the Altra I find they are more forgiving of laziness. They just roll through the miles. I’ve put over 80 miles on these and have seen very little wear.

A word about Zero Drop:

Tuesday, November 17, 2015

Review-HOKA ONE ONE Tracer: A Fast, Firm, Cushioned Road Racer with a Superb Upper

The 7oz 198g 22mm heel/18mm $130 Hoka Tracer will join the Hoka family in April 2016 as a fast, firm, well cushioned racer trainer. This is not your Grandma's soft Hoka!
With Hoka sponsoring elite road and track runners, and with a rapidly growing base of regular runners training roads in Hok,s it makes sense that in addition to their traditional trail and ultra runner base they come out with more "minimal", relatively speaking, Hokas that are suitable for fast road racing and  training.  The Tracer is the first example.

HOKA ONE ONE Tracer
The Tracer part of the new Pro2Lite line introduces new technologies and constructions I have not previously seen in Hokas.
  • A new dual density midsole construction puts softer foam in the rear of the shoe joining with  slightly firmer foam in the forefoot.  Hoka calls this approach Pro2Lite, a balance of "PROtection and PROpulsion".  
  • The upper is superb, foot well held all over yet not constricting. I did size up half a size
  • While not wide, the toe box area is particularly well executed, very light mesh supported by what now is becoming ubiquitous, a substantial TPU toe bumper which raises the front volume yet secures the foot given the rest of the soft unstructured mesh up front. 
  • For the first time a Hoka does not include Oversize Active Foot Frame, the midsole wrapping up around the foot to stabilize. The Tracer has a slight stability element through its dual density midsole.
Upper and Fit
Hoka sent me a size 9, half size up from true to size as they were out my size. The fit is about perfect for me with medium weight run socks. Snug and secure with decent toe width and volume. I did replace the thin flimsy sock liner with a more substantial one. I believe the relatively unstructured toe box with very few overlays, somewhat forgiving, the thin but not overly stretchy upper, and the toe bumper which raises the front volume should accommodate most foot types except very wide feet, understanding that this is more a race fit than trainer fit. The upper is very breathable with good drainage.


Behind the toe box the upper has a thin but substantial white overlay on the medial side to stabilize the foot. 
Medial Side HOKA ONE ONE Tracer
On the lateral side the open mesh extends further back with thin orange overlays. 
Medial Side HOKA ONE ONE Tracer


The tongue is a very thin leatherette and except for a bit of padding down the center essentially un padded. More padding at the lace up area would be appreciated although as the fit is snug and secure I did not have to lace very tight.

Midsole and Outsole
Hoka One One Tracer medial side
The midsole is dual density with a rear (white) softer foam and a red firmer foam. The red firmer foam extends further back on the medial side providing some stability yet the medial side also has a thicker layer of white foam under the  mid foot.

Hoka One One Tracer lateral  side
The feel under foot is of a fairly distinct transition point at mid foot, not a hump as with the Skechers M-Strike but something,  between softer and firmer foam. At speed is translates for me into less of a sense of transition in feel  when I am more on the mid foot and with more rapid cadence than when running slower back on the heels.

The forefoot flex is fairly stiff at first, with a distinct spring and it has taken a solid 20 miles to soften the flex more towards where I like it, so be aware of this when you first run them. More "seasoning" to go for me. Tracer is more flexible and with more of a distinct toe spring than either the Clifton2 or my favorite Huakas both with considerably more miles on them.




Outsole
The outsole is hard rubber and it is thin. I have seen no substantial wear to date but I would not expect huge from this outsole. After all this is a racing and fast running focused shoe and at 7oz the ratio of weight to cushion, be it firm cushion, is outstanding.




Comparisons
The Tracer is a light weight, no compromises racer fast trainer. Its Pro2Lite dual density midsole represents a new direction for Hoka. Those used to prior Hokas such as the Clifton and even Huaka should expect a different experience although of those two I would place the Tracer closer in feel to the Huaka but firmer. What should one expect?
  • A firmer ride for sure. 
  • Far better upper than any prior Hoka with no goofy compromises but a snug one  with a great race fit toe box. 
  • A shoe built for speed and likely not for slow, easy miles
When comparing to other shoes in its class the 7oz 22/18 stack Tracer is lighter by almost an ounce than the Kinvara 6 with the same stack heights and is firmer. I have not run in my Kinvaras recently.
Tracer is close in specs but lighter than the New Balance Fresh Foam Zante again by about an ounce. I compared Zante and Tracer, one on each foot for a short run and the one ounce heavier Zante has a smoother more consistent cushion feel not surprising as the Zante Fresh Foam is one continuous material, harder heel outsole plug, and a bit less stable forefoot. I prefer the Tracer upper which is slightly roomier with no tightness under the arch or somewhat pointy toe of the Zante.
The New Balance 1400 is another potential comparison. The 1400 is lighter by 0.7oz has a similar heel height but a considerably higher drop 23/13 leading to a 13mm forefoot which is to thin for me in even a racing shoe. Firmness of midsole otherwise quite similar as far as I can tell. 
The New Balance Vazee Pace is close in stack specs at 22/16 but heavier by an ounce. and shares the RevLite midsole with the 1400. I have not run in the Pace but suspect ride might be comparable to Tracer.
The Altra Impulse I like so much (review here) is in the same general class. FootShape toe box aside, the upper fit of the Tracer is superior, a far more dialed in, smooth fit. Advantage in the forefoot feel and cushion to the Impulse. Both try to achieve some element of stability Impulse largely through the Stablipod outsoles and Tracer with its dual density Pro2Lite midsole Their heels feel quite similar on the firm side. I toyed with running the Tracer at my recent half but with only four miles on them went with the Impulse. They needed more seasoning of the forefoot flex.
Conclusions and Recommendations

The Tracer does not feel or run like any prior Hoka. It is a firmer, no compromises racer trainer of the more "classic" variety. The upper is superb, the best of any Hoka I have run to date. The ride is not like being in a comfy chair as I have found with other Hokas, it means business.  While firm, cushioning is very adequate with a snappy toe spring. I have not had sore legs after any of my runs in them,  fresh legs after a Hoka trademark, even at speed,. The transition of foam densities takes some getting used to and favors running at speed and mid foot strikers. Tracer will be a 10K-half marathon shoe for me. Those who tend to run lighter firmer shoes but want some cushion will find them a solid choice for marathons.

Overall Score: 4.75 out of 5
-0.1 for unusual feel of dual density transition at slow speeds
-0.15 for firmness, a touch softer foam firmness overall would better suit my run style

Our review of the new Hoka One One Pro2Lite Clayton a light trainer racer is here

The Tracer was provided at no charge to RoadTrailRun. The opinions herein are entirely our own.

Order the Tracer and Clayton from Running Warehouse. Available Now!
Men's here  Women's here
Use COUPON CODE: RTR10 for 10% off! 

Tracer and Clayton are also available from the RoadTrailRun partners below.



Review-HOKA One One Tor Ultra Hi WP. Hiking Boot or Trail Running Shoe?

Review by Jeff Valliere

HOKA One One Tor Ultra Hi WP

Hoka has been an innovator and industry leader in the maximal shoe market, creating lightweight shoes with more cushion and comfort than one could have ever imagined previously.  When I first saw a pair in 2010, I, like many, laughed, called them clown shoes, etc…, but after receiving a pair of Hoka Mafates a few months later, I was completely sold.  Hoka has come a long way since then, with all of their technology, real world use, athlete feedback and testing has culminated with the Hoka Tor Ultra Hi WP.  Truly another revolutionary product from a revolutionary company.

Initial thoughts:

Is it a hiking boot or a trail running shoe?  The Hoka Tor Ultra Hi WP sure looks like a hiking boot in most regards, but does a surprisingly good job doubling as a trail runner for those looking for more performance than could be found in a traditional hiker.

Upon first viewing the Tor Ultra Hi WP, it is obviously apparent that it is BIG!  Hokas are rather large to begin with, then add an above the ankle supportive collar, full grain leather upper, heavily lugged Vibram outsole, you expect that this shoe would be very heavy.  It is by no means a lightweight at an advertised 17 oz. for a men’s size 9 (1 lb, 1 3/8 oz (494 grams) for my size 10), but it definitely felt lighter in the hand than I expected, feels light on the foot and lighter than traditional hiking boots.

This shoe is incredibly versatile and performs amazingly well in just about any condition.  Here's why.
The Upper:  The upper of this shoe primarily consists of full grain leather and textile overlays, on top of an eVent full bootie waterproof membrane, that gives the shoe a look/feel of durability and quality.  The material is moderately stiff, but in a protective, supportive and welcome sort of way, feeling sturdy without being the least bit confining or restricting.


The lacing of this shoe adds significantly to secure fit, with 6 sets of eyelets starting at the toe and then continuing upward with 2 sets of lace hooks on the ankle collar.  The tongue is built into the upper as a singular piece to prevent water/moisture from seeping in.  Padding of the tongue is moderate and also rides high, in line with the tall collar.
At first I was attracted to this shoe because of the tall ankle collar and the added benefits this would provide in deep snow, a nice upgrade/option over many other shoes with just a built in gaiter.  I was looking forward to the added ankle protection it would provide, from rocks, logs, crusty snow or any other obstacles you might find when pushing through rough terrain and conditions.  My expectation were exceeded in both of these regards, as they did protect my ankles numerous times from scuffs and bumps.  

Initially, I was somewhat worried that the high collar would be annoying, distracting or even cause chaffing, but these worries were quickly put to rest on the first run.  When trying them on in the house, the high collar was a bit noticeable and perhaps somewhat distracting, but I wore these with a mid-shin height, medium/heavy wool sock and completely forgot about the taller cuff when outside running or hiking.  With each run, the material softened a bit to become more pliable, while I also became more accustomed to the fit and feel of the shoe over time.  Additionally, the Meta-Rocker outsole helps facilitate forward motion with less bending of the ankle, which is helpful for a shoe the has such a high top.
I really appreciate the eVent material in this shoe and through my experience with the Tor and other eVent equipped shoes I have worn, I have found the eVent material to have superior waterproofing properties to their competitors, is better ventilated/breathable and maintains those properties for a longer period of time.  I was able to test this shoe in snow of various depths and consistencies, from deep fluffy powder to wet slush and my feet stayed warm and dry the entire time.  I even aimed for deep puddles when possible, creeks and even submerged the shoes in an ankle deep creek for several minutes and my feet remained completely dry.

The temperature range during the test period for the Tor, ranged from as low as the high 20’s to as high as the mid 60’s.  My feet were quite warm and comfortable on the lower end of this spectrum, but even on my runs where it was over 60, my feet were a bit warm, but not overly so.

Additionally, the Tor has a sturdy reinforced rubber toe bumper that wraps generously around and over the toe, shielding from just about any rock kick or impact.

The fit of the Tor is fairly generous.  I am a size 10 in most Hokas and I wear a size 10 in the Tor as well, but there is plenty of room to wear a thick wool sock, as the shoe is somewhat voluminous and I have a somewhat low volume foot.  If a thinner sock is preferred, then consider sizing down a half size and as always, find a way to try them on with the socks you intend to use, or order from a vendor with a good return/exchange policy.

Midsole/Outsole:  


Protection is the continued theme here as well, as this is a Hoka after all and provides a generous 32 mm of cushion in the heel and 28 mm in the forefoot.  The EVA and RMAT blended midsole is comfortable and compliant while maintaining excellent support and surprising response.  The signature maximal Hoka midsole not only provides excellent cushion for long days on the trail, but provides amazing protection from impact on rocky terrain, as I felt as though I could land on just about any size/shape rock at any speed, at any angle and I never felt a poke or jab.

The Vibram Megagrip Outsole has generous lugs, which are well positioned and have a very effective shape/pattern for maximum traction on just about any surface.  They grabbed particularly well on steep, loose dirt, snow, packed snow and slush.  Beyond the lugs though, the rubber compound is among the stickiest that I have ever used, rivaling the La Sportiva Bushido and North Face Ultra MT, my two favorite go to shoes for wet/dry traction on rock.  I could hardly get the shoe to slip in any of the above conditions, if at all.

Like other Hokas, to compensate for the high stack height, the outsole is significantly wider than normal shoes (~⅓ more surface area).  This added width, combined with the tall collar, make this shoe incredibly stable and confidence inspiring on technical downhills.

The late stage Meta-Rocker outsole helps with forward motion and is especially welcome in this shoe because of the heavier leather upper and high collar, it works as nice assist.
General Observations/Performance:


One of the highlights of my testing of the Tor came on an 8 mile loop hike/run of Eldorado Mountain in Boulder, Co., where I got to traverse a wide variety of terrain and conditions.  The start of this adventure was uphill/flat dirt road, followed by steepening, snow covered single track.  Then the real fun began, scampering, clamboring and scrambling over, through and around snow and ice covered boulders that were anywhere from the size of a kitchen stove, all the way up to the size of an SUV, then steep, snow covered side hilling with slick deadfall, class 4 sandstone scrambling, miles of steep and snowy bushwhacking.  On the run out, there was a good bit of snow/ice/slush covered trails, followed by dirt and paved road running.  Surfaces could not have been more varied and no one shoe would have been ideal for this sort of outing, but the Tor came about as close as any shoe could come for this type of wild adventure.  


Traction was amazing at all times, they scrambled well on rock, grabbed well in the snow, the ankle protection and support was welcome in the boulders and through the deadfall.  When it came time to run a fast pace once we hit maintained trails and the road, I forgot that I was wearing a shoe that resembles a boot and just felt like I was wearing any other Hoka.

The Tor is confidence inspiring at any speed, but shines on technical terrain, facilitated by the grippy Vibram outsole, cushioned and supportive RMAT midsole, secure upper and the added support the high collar gives.  For example, on a separate run, I pushed the Tor to paces in the sub 6 range for short periods and they performed quite well all things considered.

Recommended Use:

I would recommend this shoe to a wide variety of groups.  

For the mountaineer or peak bagger, looking for a warm, waterproof, protective, reasonably light, well cushioned shoe for long days or multi day trips.

Any runner who does not want to be slowed by Winter, no matter how cold and snowy it becomes.

The ultra/adventure runner out for long days that involve rugged terrain, wet/snowy conditions, where a boot might come in handy, but want a lighter shoe that can also handle long approaches.
Snowshoeing, this boot is warm enough and waterproof enough to work very well and the toe is slimmer than many dedicated Winter boots and is more likely to fit into non-expedition, running style snowshoes.

Backpacking, trekking, general hiking.  With the added cushion, ankle support, lightweight and waterproofing, the Tor would be an excellent choice.

Conclusions:

At $230 retail, the price of the Hoka Tor Ultra Hi WP is in line, if somewhat on the high side, of other waterproof hiking boots being sold at major outdoor retailers.  Given the performance, versatility and uniqueness of the Hoka Tor, I would consider that to be $230 very well spent. 

Hoka Tor Ultra is also available in women's sizes

Score: 4.85 out of 5
-0.15 for high price but you do get what you pay for in this outstanding shoe.

The Tor Ultra was provided at no charge to RoadTrailRun. The opinions herein are entirely our own.
_________________________________________________________________________
 Reviewer Bio

Jeff Valliere is a former pro cyclist who now runs and climbs the mountains of Colorado. He has been top 5 Masters, top 25 overall, at the Pike's Peak Marathon several times, finishing 3d Masters this year. Jeff loves vertical accumulating more than 500,000 vertical feet per year, has climbed all the 14's and 200 of the 13's and has held FKT on several.  He often runs and climbs at night. Passionate about the sport but also the gear he has reviewed hundred of shoes for various magazines and sites and participated in product testing for many brands.  Formerly a bike mechanic he now works in Satellite Imagery. He has twin 5 year old daughters who keep him ever busier yet.


Sunday, November 15, 2015

Review- Pearl Izumi Apparel: BioViz Safety, Functional, Comfortable, Stylish and... Phone Pockets

By Sam and Dominique Winebaum


Pearl Izumi is a long time, high quality cycling brand which about 15 years ago launched into running shoes and apparel. In running shoes they pioneered stitch free uppers and they continue to lead in that area with their 3D printed uppers. Over 20 years ago, thinking of cyclist safety, they launched their "Screaming Yellow" cyclist jackets.
         
This year they extend these safety concepts with Biologic Design, a scientifically based approach which strategically places high fluorescence fabrics (5X more visible than standard colors)  and highly reflective 3M materials to alert drivers that you are there, you are moving, and the shape is human. The elements of BioMotion visibility are: 
  • Tempo for the hips
  • Flicker lower body(legs) and arms. 
  • Pattern  of colors on the garments to provide context and contrast

Based on research conducted many years ago, this approach plays on the subconscious and our instincts to identify and track what we see. The product approach is called  BioViz. Launched Fall 2015 for running and cycling, BioViz now comes to running. The focus is not only on night time running but low light and any time where color and contrast could alert a distracted driver.

Pearl Izumi BioViz Video


We tested Pearl Izumi's BioViz Flash Pants for men and 3/4 Flash Tights for women. 

But... before we get into the details... the Flash apparel and Fly shorts all have superb pockets that will hold an iPhone 6 in decently rugged case, bounce free. We always look for good phone pockets on apparel!

Flash 3/4 Tights

Pearl Izumi 3/4 Flash Tights

Dominique has run in the Flash 3/4 tights ($60) for well over a month including at the very chilly Mount Desert Island Half in October as well as in much warmer conditions.
Pearl Izumi Women's Flash 3/4 Tight
Pearl Izumi Women's Flash 3/4 Tight

Here is what Dominique has to say about them:

"The Pearl Izumi Flash ¾ Tights are technically designed to optimize comfort and warmth, enhance visibility, flatter your silhouette, and are equipped with pockets.  Training for the MDI half-marathon, and on race day, they proved to be the right pair of tights boosting my running experience by keeping me dry and warm despite temperature fluctuations.  In the zippered back pocket, my phone stays safely in place in like manner to the wide waistband; nothing moves but my legs.  Stylish and flattering, they are a great addition to your athletic wardrobe." 

Flash Run Pants
I have been running in the Flash Run Pant ($90), what Pearl Izumi calls "a modern twist on the classic track pant".  I don't like full length tights and if do wear tights tend to go with 3/4 length. I plan to wear the Flash this winter over the 3/4 tights and knee compression socks on the coldest days. The Flash Pant is made of very light weight, stretchy fabric. I have worn it on both warmer days and chilly breezy days and it is decently wind resistant while being super breathable. The two front zipper pockets can hold an iPhone 6 without it bouncing. Not sure how they pull that off but it works. As the pants have no elastic bottom hem my medium, which I assume is supposed to also fit runners taller than me at 5'10", is a bit long and in the way when out of shoes but no issue when running. Shorter runners may want to size down as the elastic waist is very stretchy anyway. In a nice touch the bottom  of ankle zippers are protected by a small flap. And of course they are BioViz! I like the contrast!


Pearl Izumi Men's Flash Run Pant


Pearl Izumi Men's Flash Run Pant

It may be getting a bit cold for shorts but we also tested the Fly Endurance Shorts for men and women this fall. They were my go to race short for 3 halves. Both the men ($60) and women's ($50) models feature very light and stretchy fabric, just long enough for us at 4"men's and 5" women's inseams,  highly wicking mesh across the back, an anti bacterial Minerale liner, 2 drop in hip pockets for up to 2 gels per pocket, a functional mesh zipper pocket across the back which held our iPhone 6's with minimal bounce. 
Here is what Dominique said about her Fly Endurance Shorts:

"The Pearl Izumi Fly Endurance Short has become my favorite pair of running shorts.  The Fly provides comfort, style, and performance.  The pocketing system – one zippered back pocket and two side pockets – allows me to carry my phone and a supply of gel packets for my long runs.  A lifelong runner, I have never been a fan of the baggy look; these running short are tight fitting and flattering, yet extremely comfortable with just the right coverage, whether I wear them on the road or on the trails."



Pearl Izumi apparel was provided at no charge. The opinions herein are entirely our own. RoadTrailRun is an affiliate of the retailers below.

Running Warehouse has a wide selection of Pearl Izumi apparel with free 2 day shipping, and "No Sweat" easy returns. 

Men's Pearl Izumi here
Women's Pearl Izumi here

Use Road Trail Run coupon code: RTR10 at Running Warehouse checkout to get 10% off Pearl Izumi and many other brands.

Items reviewed also available from the Road Trail Run partner sites below:


Thursday, November 12, 2015

First Impressions Guest Review: ASICS MetaRun. A High End "Concept" Running Shoe

Guest Review by Derek Li

Editor's Note: I am thrilled to offer this guest first runs review of the just revealed limited edition ASICS MetaRun by fellow blogger Derek Li from Singapore. Derek's run bio is at the end of the review. He has had a pair for a week  and has run and evaluated them.  Exciting new midsole, cushioning, carbon stability plate and upper technologies on board this $250 limited edition stability shoe. It is really a concept car you can buy with ASICS testing out innovations which may show up elsewhere in the line . 

How do they run? Derek gives us his impressions.
Asics MetaRun Photo Credit: Derek Li

ASICS strikes me as a brand that wants to maintain that traditional feel in a running shoe. Indeed, their most popular racers in Japan, e.g. the Tarther Japan (one of only a handful of their running shoes still made in Japan, with the others being outsourced to China), have only undergone upper updates for the past 14 years ever since the first release in 2000. That has got to be some kind of record. It is difficult to deviate from a formula that clearly sells. If you look at the shoe counts at the Ironman World Championships in Hawaii over the last couple of years, ASICS has consistently come out on top, all this despite minimalist/maximalist trends.
A brief comparison:

2013
2014
2015
ASICS
17.5%
17.7%
17.5%
Saucony
16.5%
14.5%
14.3%
Hoka
1.9%
6.0%
11.6%

It really does make one wonder; maybe people just want a predictable durable trainer!

NEW TECHNOLOGIES
I can only imagine how hard it is to get funding to develop new technologies at ASICS, but they’ve done it. The MetaRun took two years to develop, which incidentally coincides with how long BASF and Adidas have had Boost on the market. In that process, they created two main new technologies: a new Hybrid Gel called X Gel, and a new midsole EVA foam called Flytefoam. They also introduced a carbon fibre medial stability plate and came up with a new one layer upper and a new heel counter. It is a support running shoe. I’ve had the shoe for a week now, and managed to get a few runs in it. Here are my initial thoughts

LOOKS
Asics MetaRun Photo Credit: Derek Li


With the MetaRun, they have gone with a Black/Gold/Onyx colour scheme that exudes sleek elegance. I almost couldn’t bear to put it through its first run which happened to be on a rainy day. Despite the dark tones, the heel-cup does sport a multi-tone reflective façade that should work well to reflect car beams in low light conditions.

WEIGHT
Asics MetaRun Photo Credit: Derek Li

The Metarun in US9.5 weighs 310g (10.94 oz) (Editor's Note: a size 9 should weigh about 10.5 oz) on my scale, and that puts it in line with a Hoka Stinson Lite or a Brooks Transcend. That is probably the upper limit of what I would want to use for long or easy runs. At 310g, it is still lighter than the ASICS Kayano or GT2000 though and could potentially fill the gap between the DS Trainer and these stability trainers. 

UPPER
Asics MetaRun Photo Credit: Derek Li
Asics MetaRun Photo Credit: Derek Li
ASICS in general make pretty good uppers. I like their no-nonsense racing uppers in the Hyperspeed and Blazingfast, and the slightly elastic uppers seen in the latest DS Trainers were a big step in the right direction. With the MetaRun, they went with a single layer asymmetrical FluidFit upper with a perforated mesh appearance. I would categorize this as a medium to high volume shoe. The toebox is certainly roomy and maybe even just a tad long for its size, sort of like a cross between a Hoka Huaka (length) and a Lunartempo (width – if you size up 0.5). The midfoot arch structure is low as well and would be a good option for people with lower arches.
Asics MetaRun Photo Credit: Derek Li

The heel counter is very plush, though I would consider this a high volume heel, and I did have some issues with heel slippage before adjusting the lace tension. The heel counter purports to have memory foam to improve fit but I haven’t had enough time in the shoe to see it work.

RIDE AND COMPARISONS

Asics MetaRun Photo Credit: Derek Li
I should preface this by saying I run almost exclusively in Neutral shoes, although I’ve never had problems with shoes like the Brooks Ravenna or Transcend. The MetaRun is a support shoe, by virtual of the carbon medial stability plate (AdaptTruss) and the Duomax system on the medial side.  The heel stack is at 30mm the toe 20mm, so a 10mm drop shoe. Despite it being designed as a support shoe, I did not find that this impeded my running style in any way and I think this shoe could work for neutral runners, much like the Brooks Ravenna. One of the things I like about this shoe is that it feels lighter than it weighs. It is an ounce heavier than a Hoka Huaka or a UA Gemini but they feel like they are in the same weight range when shod. I had the same impression with the Brooks Transcend when it first came out. The Transcend 1 and the Glycerin 11 were roughly the same weight, but the Glycerin felt noticeably heavier and I think it might have something to do with the weight distribution of the shoe. 
ASICS MetaRun Photo Credit: Derek Li
This shoe feels very much middle-of-the-road in terms of heel cushioning, probably closest to the UA Gemini, firmer than a Huaka/Energy Boost but not as firm as a Nike Zoom Elite. The midfoot and forefoot are noticeably softer and bouncier with a feel similar to Hoka’s RMAT, though there is more ground feel than the Huaka, possibly due to a lower stack height in the forefoot. Heel strikers may find this shoe overly firm in the heel as a long run shoe, but it should work well as a daily trainer. It probably suits midfoot strikers best as this landing pattern really accentuates the properties of the Flytefoam and gives a nice smooth transition and toe-off.

CONCLUSIONS

I’ll be putting more miles in this shoe in the coming weeks, to see how it fares in terms of durability, and also to see if the shoe softens up a little more in the heel. As is, I think it works well as a daily trainer, but I’m still undecided if it will work well for 16-20 milers, as I generally prefer a softer heel for long runs.  By way of comparison, I have used a combination of the Hoka Stinson and Clifton/Odyssey, and the Adidas Energy Boost for my long runs in the past year. The new Flytefoam is promising, and offers more bounce than the existing Solyte foam (which is used extensively in the ever popular Tarthers). I would love to see this technology trickle down to their uptempo shoes. 

Editor's Note: More information at Competitor Magazine's fine overview here where they say MetaRun will be in limited availability on November 28, $250 MSRP. They quote what one can assume are ASICS stats:
"Compared to ASICS’ flagship shoe, the GEL-Kayano 21, the MetaRun is 20 grams lighter, at 310g total shoe weight (10.9 ounces), exhibits 30 percent lower foam density in the FlyteFoam midsole, has increased stability (28 percent more in the rearfoot, 15 percent midfoot), has improved static (44 precent lateral and 26 percent medial) and dynamic fit (12 and 15 percent respectively), and an 18 percent increase in rearfoot cushioning."

Derek Li Run Bio
Derek Li is a family physician by profession, and has been running marathons for the past three years. He started running for triathlon training in 2003, and now focuses purely on running in a bid to run all the Marathon Majors. In his free time, he likes to review running shoes and related products at his blog Running Commentary.