Monday, January 09, 2017

Nike Zoom Elite 9 Review: As Good as it Gets?

Review by Peter Stuart
Nike Zoom Elite 9
Nike Zoom Elite 9
The Nike Zoom Elite 9 is an 8.2 oz/232 g men’s size 9, 6.7 oz/190 g women's size 8 lightweight tempo trainer/racer. Stack height is 27mm in the heel and 17mm in the forefoot. $120. Available now.

The Zoom Elite 9 slots in the middle of the Pegasus 33 and the Zoom Streak 6 in many ways. It’s a really terrific running shoe and certain to be one of my favorites for the coming year. I know it’s early, but the Zoom Elite 9 passes one of the major tests I have for new shoes…do I have an irrepressible smile on my face when I first run in them? Yes, yes and yes.
Nike Zoom Elite 9
If you like the Pegasus 33, but it sometimes feels like too much shoe and if you love the Zoom Streak 6, but it seems like it might not be enough for daily training, or for going all the way to 26.2, the Zoom Elite 9 is for you.

A note for lovers of the Elite line; This is a total rebuild of this shoe. For me, that’s a relief. I found the Elite 8’s to be way to stiff and didn’t enjoy running in them at all.
Nike Zoom Elite 9

Upper and Fit:
The Zoom Elite 9 runs true to size. It’s on the same last as the Zoom Streak 6.  Strangely, while I sized up on the Streak, I had no need to do so on the Elite—I think that’s largely due to the wider toebox.

The upper is flymesh.  It’s very light, holds the foot solidly, breathes well and is super comfortable.

There’s a heel counter which helps give some structure to the shoe, and has a soft ankle collar. 
Nike Zoom Elite 9
The lacing system includes flywire and (according to Nike) asymmetrical lacing. Nike has really dialed in the Flywire over the past few years—it works like a charm.  I don’t notice the lacing being particularly asymmetrical, but maybe I’m missing something.
Is the Asymmetrical?
The fit of the Zoom Elite 9 is great—one of those shoes I just laced up ran in without any fuss. The toebox is wide enough to accommodate most feet.


note slight bunching (and super swoosh)
In fact, the one knock I have on the Elite 9 (and it’s super minor) is that the bottom eyelet and material around it wind up a little bunched up for me. The swoosh comes down the outside of the foot and caps what I think is a really great, fast looking shoe.





















Midsole and Outsole:
Nike Zoom Elite 9
The midsole foam is Cushlon, a mix of Nike’s proprietary Phylon and rubber. A major difference between the Elite 9 and the Zoom Streak is the addition of a Zoom Air pocket under the forefoot of the Elite 9. I’ve heard some complaints about the air pocket in the Pegasus, but I happen to really like it. I find that in the Pegasus and the Zoom Elite the air pocket adds a really nice bounce and staves off forefoot fatigue. As far as I can tell there’s no air pocket in the heel of the Elite, which, with the lack of a shank, makes it significantly different from the Streak 6.
Nike Zoom Elite 9
The outsole is made of a thin layer of Duralon (blown rubber) which runs the whole length of the shoe. There’s a cutout in the middle of the heel and the tread is old-school waffle. It will be interesting to see how the shoe wears over a couple hundred miles. So far at around 50 there’s no significant wear. Grip is really good around corners and through wet stuff too.

Ride:
This is another knockout ride from Nike. The Elite 9 is flexible, transition is smooth, they’re forgiving at slow speeds and super responsive when you go fast. While they’re not in the same race-flat territory as the Zoom Streak 6 (due to the lack of the shank and the slight dampening from the forefoot), and they aren’t as protective for the long slog as the Pegasus 33, they’re a terrific middle ground between the two.  


Nike Zoom Elite 9

Conclusions and comparisons:
The Nike Zoom Elite 9 is a gunslinger of a swiss army knife. At this point if I could only have one shoe for all workouts, it would be the Zoom Elite 9. It’s light and flexible. It’s cushioned enough for a long run, and it loves to go fast. It’s been a delight on tempo workouts, hills and long runs. I’m very tempted to run my next marathon in them. I think they’ll be a good marathon shoe for a lot of people.

Nike Zoom Elite 9
Comparisons:
Zoom Elite 9 vs. Zoom Streak 6
The Elite, due at least partly to the air pocket in the forefoot, is a little more cushioned in the forefoot. For me the Zoom Streak 6 is unbeatable at 5k, 10k and 13.1 miles (see my RTR review here), but I’m inclined to lean towards the Zoom Elite for my next marathon. The fit of the Elite is a little more forgiving, and the air zoom pocket in the forefoot feels nice in the long miles. That said, the shank in the Streak 6 helps keep form together in later miles. It’s a toss up, get both!

Zoom Elite 9 vs. Skechers GOmeb Razor
These are my two favorite shoes right now. (Razor review coming soon but here is a RTR preview ). The Razor feels like slightly more shoe in the arch than the Elite 9 which is interesting because it’s a hair lighter and a bit lower. Razor is 7.7 Oz with stack heights of 18 heel and 14 forefoot.  Elite 9 is 8.2 Oz and 25mm in the heel, 17mm in the forefoot. The Razor is a little bit stiffer than the Zoom Elite 9. I may very slightly prefer the Elite 9. Again, a toss up between two very excellent shoes. Zoom Elite edges out the razor on flexibility and looks.

Zoom Elite 9 vs. Saucony Freedom ISO
The Zoom Elite 9 has a fair amount in common with the Freedom ISO (see RTR review here)  to me, but gets right the things that I think the Freedom gets wrong. The Freedom is flexible light and disappears on the foot, but the lack of a heel counter is a little problematic and the big issue I have with the Freedom is that once I get over 8 miles in them the forefoot starts to feel thin and unprotected. The Air Zoom Pocket on the Elite makes this shoe feel protective in the forefoot without compromising road feel. I vastly prefer the Zoom Elite 9.

Zoom Elite 9 vs. Skechers GOrun 5
Surprisingly, these two have the most similar ride of all of the shoes I’m currently running in. In fact, with one on each foot it was tough to tell the difference. The Zoom Elite is a tiny bit firmer than the GoRun (the Elite sits between Skechers Razor and GoRun in terms of firmness), but other than that, the ride feels pretty similar. The Zoom Elite holds the foot more securely and feels a little more like a standard running shoe than the slipper-like feel of the GoRun5.

Zoom Elite 9 vs. Nike Pegasus 33
The Zoom Elite 9 is, as I’ve mentioned, somewhere between the Zoom Streak 6 and the Pegasus 33. While I like the Pegasus 33 for most runs (it was my 2016 shoe of the year here), it can occasionally feel a bit blocky. The Elite 9, while a bit less shoe, is a terrific daily trainer for long miles or for going fast. If I had to pick one t would be the Zoom Elite 9. An ideal line-up would be the Pegasus 33 for long, slow days; the Zoom Elite 9 for marathons and faster days; and the Zoom Streak 6 for shorter races.

Peter's Score 9.5 out of 10
-0.25 for slight bunching over top of foot

-0.25 for potential wear issues due to limited amount of rubber on bottom of shoe

The Zoom Elite 9 was provided at no charge. The opinions herein are entirely the author's.

Photo Credit: Peter Stuart

The Zoom Elite 9 is available now!
Running Warehouse US
Use Road Trail Run Coupon Code: RTR10 to take 10% off
Men's (5 colorways) here  Women's (3 colorways) here

Running Warehouse Europe
Men's (3 colorways) here Women's (2 colorways) here


Peter Stuart's Running Bio


My running career got off to a slow start…in high school I was told I ran like a race walker and was thus relegated to race walking on the track team. I got back into running about 15 years ago and then into triathlon. Triathlon really rekindled my love for running, so about two years ago I hired a coach and really focused on the half and full marathons.  I broke a bad habit of putting in tons of moderately hard miles (and no easy or hard ones) and after plateauing at 3:25 (with some disastrous marathons in there), this past year I brought my marathon under 3:00 and my half under 1:25. Along the way I’ve developed a bit of a shoe problem.






Like & Follow Road Trail Run
Facebook:roadtrailrun.com  Twitter: @roadtrailrun Instagram:roadtrailrun

Click Here our Latest Running Shoe and Gear Reviews, over 65 in 2016!
Click Here our Spring 2017 Run Shoe Previews
Click Here our Fall 2017 Run Shoe Previews
Click Here RTR's Best of 2016 Articles










12 comments:

Kyle Kranz said...

Thanks for those comparisons at the end, Peter! Great looking shoe but I may need a lighter option.

Anonymous said...

Hi Peter, the new Nike Zoom Elite 9 seems to be interesting. I´m searching for a lightweight trainer that can also be used as a daily trainer (beside workouts). For that purpose i´m currently rotating between the Nike Lunartempo 2 and the Adidas Adios 3. I thought i maybe give the NB 1400 v4 a try though i think NB ruined the 1400 quite a bit with the v4 update (v2/v3 have been perfect for me). So, maybe any thoughts how the Zoom Elite fares against the NB 1400 v4? Thanks!

Peter Stuart said...

Hey there. Kyle, they feel lighter than the specs. If you need lighter, the Zoom Streak 6 is terrific.

Peter Stuart said...

Anonymous,

I'd go for the Elite 9 over the 1400 personally. I used to love the NB 1400 (and still like them for shorter distances) but get forefoot fatigue over 20 miles. The Elite sits somewhere between the lunartempo and the adios boost in terms of firmness. I'd say it's right in the zone of the shoes you mention.

Anonymous said...

Great review. I took mine for a brief 4.5 mile maiden voyage today and was super-impressed. I agree with Peter in that they feel much lighter than their specs. Well cushioned but give great surface feedback.

Floridastate said...

Seahawks vs Falcons
Falcons vs Seahawks
Falcons vs Seahawks
Texans vs Patriots
Patriots vs Texans

Anonymous said...

Hi Peter!
Thanks for this review.
I run in the Pegasus 33 for many of my daily training and in the Streak 6 for some key session, like race pace intervals before short race (5 to 10km). I'm searching for a lighter alternative than my Pegasus 33 for speed training, fast tempo run or triathlon race. What do you think about the new elite 9 compared to the Lunaracer?
Thanks a lot.
Pierre

Anonymous said...

One more comparison please... Zoom Elite 9 vs NB Zante v3?

Peter Stuart said...

The Zoom Elite is much more flexible than the Zante. The Zante has more shoe under the arch and feels extremely stiff and clunky to me when put in direct comparison to the Elite.

Anonymous said...

And Nike Lunaracer vs Zoom Elite 9?

Anonymous said...

How do these compare to the ride of the adidas Boston 6? More or less protective?

sam winebaum said...

Hi Anonymous,
I have run and reviewed the Boston 6 but not the Elite 9. By the stats, Boston and Boost are very close, 1 mm more in the heel for Boston and 1 mm more in the forefoot for Elite 9, I would guess Boston has a more forgiving heel due to the Boost and the Torsion plastic support so more protective in the heel than Elite. The Elite weighs 0.6 oz less. I would say Boston overall is more protective and a bit less agile than Elite. Thanks for reading Road Trail Run! Sam, Editor