Article by Sam Winebaum, Editor Road Trail Run
NIKE LUNAREPIC FLYKNIT INTRODUCES THE FUTURE OF RUNNING
Featuring a revolutionary mid-height collar design and a new tooling system, the Lunarepic Flyknit offers a virtually vanishing fit, fluid feel and superior softness.
The Lunarepic is a Concept Shoe that is practical, different, and most importantly a fabulous ride.
They are described by Running Warehouse, where I got mine, as weighing 7.8 oz/ 221 g size 9 men's, 6.6 oz/ g women's with a 28mm heel 18 mm forefoot, 10mm drop. At $175 the price is in the stratosphere. I bought my Lunarepic at retail.
Here is how those headlines play out.
- The combination of the mid-height collar as part of a 100% Flyknit upper truly makes the foot as one with the platform below
- The co-molded "new tooling system", no glue to join outsole midsole has an incredibly smooth and consistent feeling from heel letdown to flexible toe off
- Part of the tooling, the no rubber outsole, which is really the ground and sidewall layer of the midsole, has deeply siped (scored) pods deform for a subtle, smooth ground conforming piston like effect on landing and takeoff, the fluid feel.
- It's not exactly a soft shoe but it does have the unique and very pleasant "superior softness", one with no sense of either bottoming out the cushioning or sinking to far without rebound.
|Lunar Epic nike.com|
The functional variations in knit densities is incredibly detailed.
|Nike Lunarepic Flyknit Overhead Toe Box View Nike.com|
Here is now Nike describes the construction:
"Moving to the midsole, the designers employed a new dual-injection technology. Using heat, instead of glue, they fused two foams into one piece that still features traditional Lunarlon construction, with an IU foam carrier and soft IP core."
Eliminating the glue not only eliminates waste and weight but also creates a more seamless feel under foot between materials. The firmness of the two materials appears fairly closely matched with the outsole only slightly firmer. Soft midsole materials used as outsoles such as RMAT in the recently reviewed Hoka Clayton have a tendency to scuff/abrade wear. With 20 miles or so of road running often on winter road sand remnants no unusual wear observed so far. I am not expecting the outsole to outlast more conventional rubber but we'll see...
Most significantly the Lunarepic outsole incorporates what Nike describes as follows:
a rubber-free outsole with laser-siped geometric pistons inspired by pressure maps of the foot was added. Constructed of Lunarlon foam, each piston moves individually, enabling pointed compression that results in an exceptional ride. Maximizing both cushioning and traction, it provides unrivaled heel-to-toe transitions and propelling energy return.
Another big mouthful! Well again another effective innovation. There is a definite subtle sense of foot meeting road on top of mounded pistons, a gradual smooth compression and then release. It's not a noticeable piston as in a Newton or a single surface deflecting down as in the Altra Impulse. It is more noticeable in the forefoot where pressures are lighter than the heel. In the heel essentially its a single large piston. The pods are essentially a full outsole coverage particularly in the forefoot and feel like they adapt to my foot pressures at various stages of my gait. The sipes also provide great traction on wet pavement, boat shoe often have such cuts in the outsole. I tried running the always slick white paint lines in a rain storm and the grip was fine.
|Nike Lunarepic Flyknit Flexing the Outsole|
The sipes or cuts into the pods definitely play a big role in this unique feel. They contribute to the smoothness of the ride and considerable flexibility of the shoe. As they are mostly longitudinal they keep the shoe relatively stiff laterally for an element of stability. They also provide great traction.
As others, such as Thomas at Believe in the Run, said in his fine review the sipe cuts do accumulate small road grit but no bigger pieces have jammed in so far with potential for tearing. Not sure I would take them trail running but at some point will have to try. Might be quite good if the outsole does not get ripped to shreds on rocks. Not noticeable when running, removing the grit makes for some dental tool "flossing" after runs!
|Sketches illustrating design principles and construction. Nike.com|
Well a good part of the midsole is actually the outsole as well. The white Lunarlon is a carrier for the green softer inner core. The idea is that the outer shell stabilizes and the inner core cushions. Again I found this approach highly effective on the run.
|Nike Lunarepic Flyknit Lateral Side Nike.com|
|Nike Lunarepic Flyknit Medial Side Nike.com|
Now for the important part... How do they run?
The ride is unique. Nike described it well when they called it "superior softness". This by no means a marshmallow soft ride where cushioning bottoms out, or the foot sinks and sinks and one wonders what's next, how do I get up and along. It is also by no means firm in a traditional harsh sense either. I might describe it as "active" softness: plenty of cushion, a dosed and subtle piston like feeling on the way down and then up especially at slower speed. At faster speeds a smooth and relatively firm ride but with no harshness. The forefoot flexibility is noticeable, but given the upper, and I think the pods as well, there is no sense of having to work the foot to push off, no turning of the forefoot in the roomy and comfortable upper. Everything works together in the Lunarepic, very smoothly and with great confidence. I might wish for a bit more forefoot spring and stiffness along with a slightly more substantial higher heel counter with a smoother rear seam but that's about it. The Lunar Epic runs lower than its 10mm drop for me.
Nike Lunar Tempo 1 vs. Nike Lunarepic
Nike Lunar Tempo is also a shoe with Lunarlon shell and inner softer core. The Lunarepic is more stable, more directed, less slipper like. While the Lunar Tempo is just about as flexible there is less of a sense of the foot having to claw to toe off. Both have about equal cushioning but the Lunarepic has noticeably more yet subtle piston like pop off the road.
Hoka One One Clayton vs Nike Lunarepic
The 2 stars of 2016 for me. The Clayton due to its dual density midsole, softer heel with firmer forefoot has a different ride, a segmented feel while the Lunarepic is truly all of a piece. I would give the Clayton a slight nod for longer runs and the Lunarepic for relatively shorter and faster runs.
Saucony Kinvara 7 vs. Nike Lunarepic.
Clearly the Lunarepic has a superior upper for anything but a short fast race where I might give the Kinvara's more traditional snug near race flat fit the nod. Underfoot the heel of the Kinvara remains top of the class for me for 2016, the Everun really makes the difference, definitely a better rebound in the back for the K shoe, with a more agile better cushioned forefoot for the Lunarepic. If it fits your foot the Kinvara 7 is a faster shoe.
Nike recommends the Lunarepic for distance, recovery, progression. For many mid pack runners, and my advanced age I am one too, it can be a fine single shoe in the quiver for all purposes and races. The Lunarepic is packed with innovation and careful design, all of which works brilliantly and just about perfectly together on the "first try". The mid height collar and the siped podded outsole are the technical highlights but also the features that shine. From heel to toe, upper to midsole/outsole the on the run feeling is one of seamless unity between foot and shoe. Highly Recommended!
Score: 4.8 out of 5
-0.1 for some needed refinement to the heel area: counter and seams.
-0.1 for price at $175 and open questions about long term outsole durability.
Like & Follow Road Trail Run
The Nike Lunarepic Flyknit is available from Running Warehouse.
Use Road Trail Run Coupon Code: RTR10 for 10% off.